First century Roman culture was a culture of despair. Some historians would refer to it as a culture of suicide. It was violent, it was bloody, it was dangerous, it was oppressive, it was full of death and disease. On top of that the religious establishment had created such religious oppression that people lived in bondage. Most had given up any thought that they could ever stand right before a holy God. It was into that context that Jesus uttered the words, “Come unto Me, all who are weary and heavy laden, and I will give you rest.” About three decades later, the writer of Hebrews would give a message to people on the threshold of bloody persecution. The message was not a message of health, wealth and prosperity. It was a message that in the midst of the pain, you can enter His rest. So here we are two thousand years later. I think we all get this. Sometimes the world can be very, very painful, hurtful, heartbreaking, confusing, devastating. In the midst of all of that, what Jesus offers us is rest. That’s what we want to talk right now. If you have a Bible, turn to Hebrews, Chapter 4.
One of the terms that we’ve seen a lot in the book of Hebrews is the word therefore. You know the old adage: Whenever you see the word ‘therefore’ you stop to see why it’s there for. And it basically reminds us that all of these truths are connected. You can’t take any one passage in Hebrews and pull it out of its context, for one truth leads to another truth, which leads to another truth and it’s all connected together. It’s good that we keep remembering that. Chapter 3 was all about the cost of unbelief, which then leads us to Chapter 4 verse 1:
Therefore (in light of that, the cost of unbelief), then let us fear if, while a promise remains of entering His rest, anyone of you may have seemed to have come short of it. (*NASB, Hebrews 4:1)
So what’s the fear? The fear is that even though there’s still a promise of rest, it wasn’t just about people thousands of years ago entering a land. It wasn’t just about people in the first century. It’s every bit as true for us today. There is a promise of rest. The word promise is really an important word in the book of Hebrews. As a matter of fact, no New Testament book uses the term more than the book of Hebrews. What do you say to a group of people that are on the threshold of bloody persecution? You remind them, there’s a promise. There is a promise that, in the midst of the storm, I will give you rest now, and a glorious future to come. But the concern is that they won’t believe it. It’s interesting that he says, anyone of you may seem to have come short of it. This basically confirms what we talked in the last chapter—that when the writer is looking at the first readers, his audience, he’s identifying them primarily as believers but he’s not convinced they’re all believers. There is no New Testament writer who could know that everyone who will receive this letter is a believer. So there seem to be some who perhaps don’t believe. Maybe they’re giving lip service; maybe they’re just going with the flow, but he says, “But it may seems like you’re coming up short. You don’t really believe it.” So that’s our audience—primarily believers—but the writer is not convinced that everybody believes, and that’s part of his concern here. Verse 2:
For indeed we have had good news preached to us, just as they also; but the word they heard did not profit them, because it was not united (mixed in) by faith in those who heard.
So the children of Israel heard good news. We talked about this last time. The good news was that God will give you the Promised Land—a land flowing with milk and honey. But the truth was not mixed with faith; therefore it did not profit them. They did not believe. The writer is saying, in the same way we have good news. We, too, have an offer of rest that we can enter into—a promise of rest. But that promise has to be mixed with faith if we are going to profit from it. It is a reminder that even though Jesus died for the sins of the world, the message is not universalism. It’s not, “Everybody’s in!” The truth has to be mixed with faith. There’s God’s part and there’s our part—that’s always the way it is. God’s part is He has done the work, and He offers rest. Our part is we have to believe, mixed with faith, in order for that truth to profit us. Verse 3:
For we who have believed (the writer puts himself in there) enter that rest, just as He has said, “AS I SWORE IN MY WRATH, THEY SHALL NOT ENTER MY REST,” although His works were finished from the foundation of the world.
So what is he talking about there? He’s saying we who have believed enter into that rest. When David said to the children of Israel in Psalm 95 that with belief they can enter God’s rest—My rest—God says, there’s a reminder that even though they were in the land, David was concerned that they would not enter into His rest. In other words, the land wasn’t the point. The land was a picture; the land was a shadow. Are we saying today that in order to enter into God’s rest, we have to all fly to Israel and enter the land? And we all understand, “Of course not!” So the land was a picture, a metaphor, a shadow. David comes along with Psalm 95, they are in the land—David’s king over the land; he’s reigning over the land—but his concern is that they still won’t enter His rest because the rest isn’t just the land (neither is it the seventh-day Sabbath, which the Jews were already observing); these are just a picture, a metaphor. So what is it? It’s God saying, “My rest,” which goes all the way back to Genesis 2:2 where it says the rest of God started all the way back at the foundation of the world. In Genesis 2:2, we’re told that “on the seventh day God rested.” He quotes that in verse 4:
For He has said somewhere concerning the seventh day: “AND GOD RESTED ON THE SEVENTH DAY FROM ALL HIS WORKS”; and again in this passage, “THEY SHALL NOT ENTER MY REST.” (VS. 4-5)
So here’s what he’s saying: On the seventh day of creation, God rested. Why did God rest? Was He worn out? Had he had a really hard week? God didn’t rest because He was tired; He rested because the work was done. The text says that when God had completed His work, He rested. Then He placed Adam and Eve in His rest. This is essentially what defined paradise. God had done the work; once it was completed, He rested, He didn’t begin another work and rest cycle. He rested from creative work once and for all. Adam and Eve entered into that state of rest. This is what God has always wanted for people made in His image. But as you know the story, Adam and Eve sin; chaos enters the world, yet God still promises rest—“to enter into My rest.” Was it the land? Or was it a day? The land was just a metaphor, just a picture. David comes along hundreds of years later and he still desires for the people by faith to enter God’s rest. It wasn’t just the land; it wasn’t even about a day. It was something far more than that. Now one of the interesting parts of Genesis 2:2: When God rested is not on day 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6—each one of those days ends with, “There was morning and there was evening.” But on the seventh day, when God rested, you don’t read those words because “the rest of God” was not a day of the week. It was not confined to one day of the week. It was a state. God had now completed the work; it was a state of rest He enter from that seventh day onward, and He wanted people made in His image to enter into that rest daily. So the Jewish promised land is a shadow, the Jewish Sabbath day of the week is a shadow, but God’s rest is something far more than that. God’s seventh day rest was available to them, but they refused to enter, that’s why God’s say He will not allow them to enter into His rest, yet they observed the weekly ritual seventh day Sabbath rest (they would have been stoned had they not (Numbers 15:32-36). Verse 6:
Therefore, since it remains for some to enter it, and those who formerly had good news preached to them failed to enter because of disobedience,”
So today there remains a rest for us to enter into, but we do so by faith. We talked about this: Disbelief leads to disobedience! Whenever I don’t believe God tells the truth, then I do it my way. Whenever I don’t believe that God’s going to meet some need in my life, I do it my way. Disbelief always leads to disobedience; that’s the concern of the writer. So verse 7:
He again fixes a certain day…
Okay, there it is! He again fixes a certain day—a day of rest. What day is that? Well, it’s today! Last time I said, “It’s today,” and they said, “Oh, it’s Saturday.” Some other said it is “Sunday”. This has been a longstanding debate: Is it Saturday or is it Sunday? Are we still under the Sabbath of the old covenant? Or is Sunday, the new covenant Sabbath? Answer: “Neither…Neither!” The Sabbath rest today is today! Ask me on Tuesday; I’ll say, “It’s today!” Ask me on Friday, I’ll say, “It’s today!” It’s not a holy day of the week; that was just a metaphor; it’s just a shadow. It’s not a holy piece of ground or “the holy land” (Zec 2:12); it was just a metaphor—a shadow as well. Ultimately it is a state to enter into the rest of God. That’s what he’s saying: “What day is it?” “It’s today!” Verse 7:
He again fixes a certain day, (what day?) “Today,” saying through David after so long a time just as has been said before, “TODAY IF YOU HEAR HIS VOICE, DO NOT HARDEN YOUR HEARTS.” For if Joshua had given them rest, He (God) would not have spoken of another day after that. (Vs. 7-8)
So Joshua is the Hebrew version of the name Jesus. So Jesus is the Greek version. The Hebrew version of the exact same name is Joshua, and it reminds us that Joshua in the Old Testament was a type or a picture of the Messiah to come, a picture of the Jesus to come. So what did Joshua do? Joshua led them into the land of promise. They claimed the land. They observed weekly holy days. But God still promised that day of rest was yet to come. So what he’s saying is, “If entering and possessing the land was the rest, then there would be no reason to say there’s still another day of rest coming, unless the land was merely a metaphor, a picture. Just like the Sabbath day was was a shadow, the land was a shadow of the ultimate fulfillment to come. Verse 9:
So there remains a Sabbath rest for the people of God.
Now that phrase Sabbath rest is actually one word in Greek. It’s not found anywhere else—this is the only place it is found. It doesn’t say that there is a Sabbath day; it says there is a Sabbath rest. Again a state is intended! No a day or a piece of land. So what is the Sabbath rest that remains for the people of God today? It’s not a piece of land; it’s not a day of the week; those were just shadows; they were just pictures. What is it? Verse 10:
For the one who has entered His rest (how did he do that?) has himself also rested from his works, as God did from His.
There it is right there—verse 10! This is the main theme of the gospel all throughout the New Testament. Who is it that enters into God’s rest by faith? Not God’s work and rest cycle, but God’s rest. It’s the one who ceases from his or her works and enters into God’s rest. On what day? Today. So what is the Sabbath rest about today? It’s about not working. What does that mean? It has nothing to do whether or not you mow your lawn on a Sunday. It has nothing to do with whether or not your business is open or closed on a Saturday. It has nothing to do with whether or not you are working the fields on a Sunday or Saturday. It has nothing to do with that. Sunday or Saturday is not the new covenant Sabbath. It has nothing to do with that. What does it have to do with? The idea of works is used consistently throughout the New Testament as defining those things we’re doing to somehow try to merit favor with God—efforts of self-righteousness, religious activity, things we’re trying to do to make ourselves good enough for God. The world is full of religion. Religion taps into our desire to be our own god. I want to do it myself; I want to make myself righteous; I want to make myself spiritual; I want to measure up on the basis of my own efforts. But religion is oppressive; religion is damaging; religion is full of hopelessness and despair because every day you are reminded that you’re actually just a loser that will never measure up to that perfect standard before a holy God.
We know from the book of Hebrews what the work is that God completed—the fulfillment of a promise that at a point in time, the Creator God of the universe took on human flesh. He blazed a trail of salvation by conquering sin and death once and for all. As the ultimate High Priest, He offered Himself as the ultimate sacrifice for sin to make propitiation for sin. Chapter 1 said to make purification for sin. He was buried; He rose again; He returned to the Father and what did He do? We learned this in Chapter 1: He sat down. The priest was never allowed to sit because their job was never done, because it was only a foreshadowing of the promise of One who would ultimately pay the price for sin. Jesus uttered on the cross, “It is finished!” When He rose from the dead, He returned to the Father and the great High Priest sat down! Mission accomplished; paid in full! What did He do at the right hand of the Father? He rested. He created the rest of God that God has always wanted for people made in His image. How do we enter into that rest? By faith! We cease from our own self-righteous works. We give up our own attempts to merit favor with God through religious activity, and in brokenness and humility we acknowledge the only hope we have is what Jesus did for us. We enter into the finished work of Christ. This is a consistent message throughout the New Testament. We’re going to throw a couple of verses just to remind ourselves of this message:
But to the one who does not work but believes in Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is credited as righteousness. (*NASB, Romans 4:5)
This is the theme of the New Testament. This is verse 10. There is a Sabbath rest. “Is it a piece of ground?” “No, it’s not!” “Is it a day of the week?” “No, it’s not!” Those were just shadows or pictures. But ultimately Sabbath rest is when we rest from our own attempts at self-righteousness and we simply rest in what God has done for us through Jesus. Sometimes people will say to me, “How come you don’t keep the Sabbath?” Answer: “I keep it every day.” What a shame just to keep one day of the week. Ask me on Tuesday, I’ll say, “It’s today!” I rest in the finished work of Jesus on the cross today. Ask me on Friday, I’ll say, “It’s today!” I rest in the finished work of Jesus on the cross. It has nothing to do with mowing your lawn, opening your business, or working in the field. It has to do with resting in what Jesus has done for us on the cross. There is a Sabbath rest. Verse 11:
Therefore let us be diligent to enter that rest, so that no one will fall through following the same example of disobedience.
Now clearly rest is not automatic. It’s not even automatic for believers. That’s why he says, “…be diligent; work really hard at resting.” There are those who have never trusted Christ. They need to believe this is true. Perhaps they’ve been used and abused and beat up by religion and need to hear, “That’s not what it’s about.” But it’s also possible for those of us who have trusted Christ to still be miserable because we don’t rest in the finished work of Jesus on the cross. The enemy comes along and he whispers in your ear, “You’re a loser; you’re a failure; you’ll never measure up. Who do you think you are that God just hands out some kind of a salvation as a gift? You’ve got to be kidding me. God probably is so annoyed that you’re in His presence because you’re a loser.” How many lies does the enemy whisper in our ears and we’re anxious; we’re fearful; we’re hopeless, and we’re despairing because we are not diligent to rest.
Can I come to the end of a day where I’ve blown it, biffed it, and disappointed God and myself again and still be at rest? Answer: “Yes!” …resting in the finished work of Jesus on the cross. I need to be diligent to rest because when I rest, when I think that way, when I remember what’s true, that is the most likely scenario where I’m going to be repentant, where I’m going to confess, where I’m going to do it differently tomorrow—because I remember again who I am in Christ! Verse 12:
For the word of God is living and active and sharper than any two-edged sword, and piercing as far as the division of soul and spirit, of both joints and marrow, and able to judge the thoughts and intentions of the heart. And there is no creature hidden from His sight, but all things are open and laid bare to the eyes of Him with whom we have to do. (Vs. 12-13)
In other words, Him with whom we will be accountable. So the Bible is not just words on a page. It’s a living, breathing book. It’s the God-breathed Word of God. God takes His words with His Spirit and He penetrates and He judges and He sorts out, and He presents us naked. That’s literally what it says—naked before a Holy God—the One to Whom we will give an account. For some people that is an absolutely terrifying thought. For some people they will avoid the book because the book terrifies them because it penetrates and it judges; and it discerns and it sorts out; and it presents us naked before a Holy God. But for those of us who believe, it is where we find the truth.
It’s where we find grace and mercy. It’s where we find relief from the bondage of religion and enter into the rest of God. It’s where we find guidance; it’s where we find life. When we understand the truth about God’s rest, I am not terrified to be presented naked before a holy God because I know I stand in the rest—the finished work of Jesus on the cross. It’s the living, active Word of God that gives me life, that gives me hope, that gives me a future, that gives me what I need to rest in my most difficult moments in life. Verse 14:
Therefore, since we have a great high priest who has passed through the heavens (meaning back to the Father to be seated), Jesus the Son of God (that’s His humanity and His deity), let us hold fast our confession (our statement of faith, what we believe). For we do not have a high priest who cannot sympathize with our weaknesses, but One who has been tempted in all things as we are, yet without sin. Therefore let us draw near with confidence (boldly) to the throne of grace, so that we may receive mercy and find grace to help in time of need. (Vs. 14-16)
When we go through the most difficult moments of life, we cry out not to a god who is so abstract and disconnected we have no sense that he understands what we are going through. That’s not who He is. It’s the One who actually took on human flesh. As remarkable as that may seem, the God of the universe actually became one of us—and He walked on this earth. He knows our struggle; He knows our pain; He knows our trials and our temptations; This is the God who loves me; this is the God who saved me; this is the God who’s experienced the struggle and the pain that I’m going through. I come boldly and confidently into the presence of God, and in my hour of need I find grace and mercy. I find what I need to get me through another day!
There is a Sabbath rest. It’s not a day of the week; it’s not a piece of ground. It’s a Person. It’s a Person who did for me what I could not do for myself—and He offers it freely as a gift! If mixed with faith, I believe and enter into His rest.
He’s just inviting you, by faith, to enter that rest, to experience the forgiveness of sin, and to experience a relationship with God. I would invite you this morning, to enter into that rest. What day is the Sabbath rest? It’s today! Why would you wait? Why would you wait until tomorrow? Why wouldn’t you enter that rest today?
Our Father, it’s really just so hard to comprehend that the God of the universe actually took on human flesh to make a way of salvation, to conquer sin and death once and for all, to make payment for sin, and to simply offer it freely as a gift. Lord, we’ve been reminded that truth has to be mixed with faith. We have to choose to believe that’s true to enter into Your rest. Lord, may today be our day of Sabbath rest. In Jesus’ name, Amen.
See also: God’s rest is not the Jewish Sabbath,
Hebrews 4 actually denies the idea that the 7th day Sabbath was an Old Covenant type/shadow for the Sabbath in Christ realised by the New Covenant. By definition, a type and its antitype cannot exist at the same point in time. Once the antitype arrives, the type ceases to have significance and is set aside so that the antitype can be focused on. Observe carefully what Hebrews 4 says. It says that the rest was available to people in the Old Covenant but was not entered into because of unbelief. However, the 7th day Sabbath was also a reality during the Old Covenant. Thus, the 7th day Sabbath cannot be a type of the New Covenant rest in Christ because they both existed at the same time historically.
Thank you for sharing your opinion friend but it is formed on a fallacy. You seem to be saying that the Sabbath was a tangible Old Covenant reality, although its keepers failed to enter God’s rest out of unbelief. Admittedly, the Sabbath was a tangible reality for Jews during the ministry of Jesus Christ, as were the sacrifices and the temple. Now, would you claim that the sacrifices (types), which co-existed for roughly four decades with Jesus and the early Christian church, were not a type of New Testament realities? Doesn’t Adventism (perhaps your are not one) claim that the Hebrew tabernacle and temple were types of a co-existing heavenly reality? If one believes that, one certainly can’t say that a type and its antitype can’t possibly co-exist in time.
But there are deeper problems in your point. I fail to see any proof in the New Testament that the Sabbath was ever binding for non-Jews, specifically for Christians of Gentile descent, particularly for those living outside Israel. According to Talmudic teachings, a non-Jew couldn’t legally keep the Sabbath, even if he wanted, unless he became circumcised to begin with. Christians of Gentile descent were never required to be circumcised, which means they could never keep the Sabbath. It was never binding for them, so that Old Testament institution was a fitting type of a larger New Testament antitype of our rest in Christ. One must also read Col 2:16-17 where it clearly states that the sabbath was a shadow of things to come. The reality is Christ. The Sabbath ritual and all the other festivals were fulfilled in Christ.
Sabbath is a weekly feast (Lev. 23) found in the Law of Moses/Law of God. Jews views it as the only ritual law in the Ten. It is a ritual law with many other ceremonial laws that Jesus fulfilled. There is no requirement to observe the ritual except within the Law of Moses. But Christians are no longer under the Law of Moses, but the Law of Christ!
Thanks John for your response.
Yes, I am saying that the rest described in Hebrews 4 was a tangible Old Covenant reality which seems to have been rejected by the majority in that time. That is why Hebrews 4:2 says that “we also have had the good news proclaimed to us, *just as they did*; but the message they heard was of no value to them, *because they did not share the faith of those who obeyed*”
Lets break down the typology of the ceremonial system and how it related to New Testament Christianity. Of course, history tells us that the temple services still existed after Jesus’ sacrifice as the antitypical lamb and after his ascension and inauguration as our antitypical high priest. However, the point is that the bible teaches these earthly services only continued because those who ran them failed to see that Jesus’ ministry was a better ministry (according to Hebrews 8) which had actually replaced the earthly system. In fact, there are at least two occasions where the bible tells us that Jesus made the earthly sacrifices obsolete. The first is Hebrews 8:13 – “By calling this covenant “new,” he has made the first one obsolete” – and the second is Daniel 9:27 – “In the midst of the week He (Jesus) will put an end to sacrifice and offering.” The reality is that it didn’t matter that the temple services happened until the destruction of the temple in 70 AD because what really mattered was Jesus as our sacrifice and as our High Priest applying the benefits of that sacrifice in Heaven. So no, Adventism does not teach that the Hebrew tabernacle and Heavenly tabernacle co-existed in function.
Let’s stay focused on Hebrews 4 here (I’m sure you have other articles where we can discuss Colossians 2 and various other New Testament perspectives). Again, the 7th day Sabbath cannot be an old covenant type of our rest in Christ because both were available to old covenant believers (cf. Heb. 4:2). Thus, both are applicable for new covenant believers too.
Harrison, I do not see weight in your type vs antitype arguement. Take Jesus the ‘lamb slain from the foundation of the world’. This is the reality from the foundation of the world, and everyone in the OC was going to be saved based on this reality, whether they understood fully or not. John understood Jesus was the reality before the cross. So, during the OC time, the shadow or types also existed in the form of animal sacrifices together with reality. Similarly, God’s rest was available from foundation of the world, whether everyone understood it or not, and so did the Sabbath which we are told is a shadow in Col 2, but the reality is Christ. So, without trying to fit your theology into a framework you have created, you need to ask, does God require Sabbath observance in the New Covenant for Christians. As a former Adventist myself, I believed it was so once. But I do not believe as the Scriptures tells me no such thing. Adventism has a very interesting way of studying and teaching Scriptures, jumping from text to text, and missing the context that is in between. If only Adventist would read the Bible verse by verse, chapter by chapter, book by book, and compare scripture with scripture.
God at times commanded specific laws to certain people and nations. God commanded Noah to build an ark, Abraham to leave the country. Jews to observe weekly, monthly, yearly Sabbaths, get circumcised among MANY other things. There are principles behind these laws that are applicable to us, but not all is required of Christians. Instruction, and commands, rebukes for Christians are founded in the teachings of Jesus, and the apostles. Jesus nor apostles command anyone to observe the sabbath, nor condemn anyone for not observing it. The covenant in which the Sabbath was part of is now obsolete (Heb 9:1-4). The sabbath is presented as a ritual, ceremonial law, that can be broken without sin, and as a shadow (see sabbath is a ritual article) in the teachings of the apostles and Jesus. Jews (literal Israel) understood and still teach that Sabbath is a ritual law (check Jewish talmud, encyclopedia etc.). If we are spiritual Israel, then Sabbath is a still a ritual law just as the Bible teaches, and just as literal Israel understood it, and we know that Christ has taken away the shadow (the entire system of the Old covenant by the way), as a New Covenant has been set in place.
Take a read of the studies of Hebrews from chapter 1 that I have posted. See what you think.
John, it is great to explore Biblical types and antitypes with you.
You can’t possibly be saying that Jesus was actually slain at the foundation of the world. Maybe the plan was put in place at that time. Maybe God knew at that time who would actually be the individual beneficiaries of Jesus’ sacrificial atonement (Ephesians 1:3-5). But Jesus was not slain at that time. We have historical data for Jesus’ death, it did not happen at the foundation of the world. What this means is that while everyone in the Old Testament would be saved by Jesus applying his blood for them in the Heavenly Sanctuary, there wasn’t actually any blood for Him to apply until after his death, resurrection and inauguration as our High Priest. This is why Hebrews 8:6 says that “now He has obtained a more excellent ministry.” When did Jesus “obtain” His High Priestly Ministry? It was “now” according to the author of Hebrews, not at the foundation of the world. There is no overlap between type and antitype here.
I read your study of Hebrews 8:1-13 with interest to see how you would interpret verse 6. It turns out you agree entirely with what I’m saying. Here’s what you wrote:
“But now (Here’s the contrast) But now He has obtained a more excellent ministry (So something has changed.) by as much as He is also the mediator of a better covenant, which has been enacted on better promises.
This whole idea of mediation has always been the problem. All the way back to Genesis chapter three, the question has been, “How does a holy God have a relationship with sinful men and women?” The whole idea of the old covenant system—the law, the tabernacle, the temple, the priestly system, the sacrificial system—all of that was meant to be a type or a shadow of this layer of mediation. How do sinful men and women have a relationship with a holy God? Answer is, “They had to go through this level of mediation somehow to make it possible.”
Now it’s important to understand that that could not save them. The Scriptures are very clear that people in the old covenant could be saved, but it wasn’t on the basis of that religious activity, but on the basis of their belief, by faith, that God made a promise that one day He would send a Savior who would die for their sins. In essence, people in the old covenant were saved by faith—kind of on credit—looking forward to the belief that one day God would keep that promise.
It would be right to say that if Jesus had never come, none of those people could have been saved. It was all on credit, hanging on their belief that one day the Savior would come. So their entering into the system was basically an act of faith, that this middle layer of mediation is somehow a shadow or a picture of God’s ultimate fulfillment of the promise. That’s what he’s talking about in verse six, that there is now a better covenant that is built on better promises, and we learned in the previous chapter that includes a better hope.”
This establishes that:
1. The Old Covenant ceremonial system was a type of Jesus’ sacrificial death and High Priestly Ministry.
2. According to Hebrews, Jesus’ sacrifical death and High Priestly ministry did not actually begin to function until well after the Old Covenant ceremonial system was established
3. Jesus’ sacrificial death and High Priestly ministry has made the Old Covenant ceremonial system obsolete.
4. Thus, your assertion that “during the OC time, the shadow or types also existed in the form of animal sacrifices together with reality” does not fit the biblical data.
5. Thus, the seventh day Sabbath cannot be a type of this Sabbath in Christ that you have written about.
May God bless your studies abundantly.
My friend, not just myself, but SDA’s themselves will disagree with your point about realities not existing at the same time as shadows.
1) The throne of God in the heaven itself was the reality existing while the early template gave a shadow of God’s presence. So according to you, it must be that God’s throne did not exist in reality while the shadow was on earth.
2) The entire Law was a shadow ( you assume only the ceremonial law was), but the text doesn’t say that. The entire law of the Old Testament written on Book and Stone was a shadow, but what God intended was the law to be written on heart in reality which Israel as nation did not experience, but individuals did experience.
3) Abraham and his seed were to be circumcised from birth. But Abraham was circumcised in the heart before receiving this shadow.
4) Eating bread and wine is but a mere representation of the life of Christ in the soul. (John 6:53-55) The communion service therefore is not a reality, but a type of reality, a shadow.
5) Baptism into water is not a reality. It is only a symbol of that reality, it is a type, a shadow.
6) The blood of bulls and goats could never purge the conscience of sin. (Heb 10:4). Therefore Abel had to have had the reality of the blood of Christ in order to be made righteous. (Heb 11:4). The reality though future for them and past for us was as good for them as it is for us (Rev 13:8).
7) Sabbath is a shadow, Christ is the reality (Col. 2). You say ceremonial laws are done away, so was the weekly Sabbath a shadow, so it is done away.
8) There is no requirement to observe the Sabbath for Christians just like there is no requirement to observe Circumcision.
My friend you shadow, reality theory do not add up
Thanks for reading my posts.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but I understood your thesis in this blog post to be that the 7th-day Sabbath was an old-covenant type of the new-covenant spiritual rest that is found in Christ. Is that accurate?